Workflow map
The current people, inputs, systems, decisions, exceptions, and handoffs in one readable view.
Choose the engagement that matches the decision in front of you.
HAWT uses four defined scopes. Start by deciding what deserves attention, establishing a working method, proving one workflow, or improving something already in use.
Start with the unresolved question.
Which workflow is worth pursuing?Decision Sprint
How should this team use AI?Team Enablement
Can this process work in practice?Workflow Pilot
What should improve next?Ongoing Improvement
01 / Decide
Workflow Decision Sprint
Use this when leadership sees several possible AI projects but lacks the evidence to choose one. HAWT reviews a defined area of work and produces a practical decision package.
Ask about the sprint- Timeline
- 10 business days
- Client team
- One sponsor plus 3 to 6 people close to the work
- Working format
- Remote interviews, artifact review, and two decision sessions
- Finish line
- One recommended pilot with its owner, constraints, and success checks
Opportunity scorecard
Candidate uses ranked by value, repeatability, data readiness, risk, effort, and review burden.
Control requirements
Information boundaries, access needs, human review points, and known failure conditions.
Pilot brief
A defined first test with users, scope, inputs, outputs, measurements, and a go or no-go decision.
Not a generic AI strategy deck.
The sprint is intentionally narrow. It does not include software procurement, production development, or a company-wide rollout plan.
02 / Adopt
Team AI Enablement
Use this when employees are already experimenting but the team lacks shared methods, boundaries, examples, and ownership.
Review the training program- Timeline
- 2 to 4 weeks
- Client team
- One department or working group
- Working format
- Preparation, live role-specific training, and an adoption review
- Finish line
- A shared method the team can use and manage without HAWT
Workflow preparation
Examples, documents, decisions, and sensitive-data boundaries selected before the live session.
Live working session
Hands-on use of ChatGPT, Claude, or both against representative company work.
Team working kit
Reusable instructions, examples, review checks, and information boundaries for the chosen roles.
30-day adoption plan
Named owners, practice tasks, office hours, and a short list of signals to review after rollout.
03 / Prove
Workflow Pilot
Use this when the workflow and users are known, but the organization needs evidence that a custom assistant, integration, or application will work with real inputs.
Review the pilot- Timeline
- 4 to 8 weeks
- Client team
- One business owner plus a small user group
- Working format
- Weekly reviews, staged releases, and structured user testing
- Finish line
- A working pilot and an evidence-based production decision
Working system
A narrow assistant, document tool, integration, workflow interface, dashboard, or internal application.
Evaluation set
Representative examples and failure cases used to test usefulness, accuracy, and review burden.
User trial
Real users complete defined tasks and record corrections, exceptions, time, and adoption friction.
Handoff and next decision
Documentation, training, open risks, operating ownership, and a recommendation to stop, revise, or scale.
04 / Improve
Ongoing Improvement
Available after a HAWT training program or pilot. This keeps useful systems current without creating an open-ended consulting arrangement.
Discuss ongoing support- Cadence
- Monthly or quarterly
- Client team
- The operating owner and affected team leads
- Working format
- Usage review, issue triage, controlled updates, and planning
- Finish line
- Agreed improvements shipped and the next priorities documented
Adoption review
What people use, avoid, correct, or work around after launch.
Quality review
Output issues, failures, data changes, and new constraints that affect the system.
Controlled improvements
Prioritized updates to instructions, integrations, interfaces, evaluations, or training material.
Next-release plan
A short decision record showing what changed and what deserves attention next.
When HAWT is probably not the right fit.
No workflow owner
A useful pilot needs someone who owns the current result and can make operating decisions.
No access to users
We do not design around assumptions when the people doing the work cannot participate.
A tool has already been chosen
If the only acceptable answer is a predetermined platform, implementation may belong with that vendor.
Scale before evidence
We will not recommend a company-wide rollout before one representative workflow has been tested.
Not sure which engagement fits?
Describe the unresolved decision. HAWT will recommend the smallest useful starting point.